China confirms: Both are taking steps to ease LAC situation
The Indian Express
Dated: June 11, 2020
By: Shubhajit Roy
A day after it emerged that Indian and Chinese troops have begun moving back from
standoff positions at different points in the Galwan and Hot Spring areas of
Ladakh, Beijing said on Wednesday that the two sides have started implementing
the “positive consensus” reached by senior commanders of the two countries on
June 6 and are taking steps to “ease” the situation along the Line of Actual Control (LAC).
This is the
first official response from the Chinese government, while the Indian side has
not issued any statement so far.Meanwhile,
the two sides held Major General-level talks, which lasted over four hours, on
Wednesday. Sources said the Indian side pressed for restoration of status quo
ante, reiterating that troops should move back to the positions held in
April-end, before the standoff began. The Indian side also sought reduction in
the number of Chinese troops in the region.
In Beijing, asked about reports of troops on both sides
disengaging and moving back to their previous positions, Chinese foreign
ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying told a media briefing that both the
countries are taking steps to ease the situation along the borders.
“Recently, the diplomatic and military channels of China and India held effective
communication on the situation along the border and reached positive
consensus,” she said. “The two sides are following this consensus to take
actions to ease the situation along the borders,” she added.
On Monday,
Beijing had said both sides agree that there is need to implement the
“consensus” among the leaders of the two countries, and ensure that
“differences do not escalate into disputes”.
The Chinese
spokesperson had said that both sides had maintained “close” communication; in
today’s statement, the spokesperson said there was “effective communication” —
signalling a forward movement in the negotiations.
The movement at the border has been perceived as the first
possible sign of de-escalation along the LAC. However, Indian officials have
cautioned that it should be seen as a “first step” towards a long, phased and
gradual process of disengagement, and there should be no expectation of immediate
or quick withdrawal of troops and weaponry.
Explained: The strategic road to
DBO
The
disengagement process may take weeks. “Physical verification as well as
satellite imagery will help us in complete disengagement,” sources said.
Deployments by both sides took place over the last one month, and it will take them time to step back.
Deployments by both sides took place over the last one month, and it will take them time to step back.
Army sources
have confirmed that troops moved back on either side after the meeting between
XIV Corps Commander Lt General Harinder Singh and South Xinjiang Military
District Commander Major General Liu Lin at the Chushul-Moldo border point on
June 6.
It was decided that officers at division, brigade and battalion
levels would hold discussions to settle local issues for further de-escalation.
Resolution of the Pangong Tso standoff may require another meeting at the level
of Corps or Division Commanders, sources had said.
The two sides were involved in faceoffs at five locations:
Patrol Points 14, 15 and 17, Finger area of Pangong Tso and Chushul. While
troops are stepping back in other areas, the standoff continues in the
contested Fingers area on the north bank of Pangong Tso where Chinese troops
are not allowing Indian patrols beyond Finger 4 — it is 8 km west of Finger 8
which India says denotes the LAC.
After the
meeting of the Indian and Chinese army commanders, the Ministry of External
Affairs had said on Sunday: “Both sides agreed to peacefully resolve the
situation in the border areas in accordance with various bilateral agreements
and keeping in view the agreement between the leaders that peace and
tranquility in the India-China border regions is essential for the overall
development of bilateral relations.” There has been no statement from the
Indian government since then.
Comments
Post a Comment