PB Mehta writes: SC was never perfect, but the signs are that it is slipping into judicial barbarism
Hindustan Times Written by Pratap Bhanu Mehta Updated: November 18, 2020 This phenomenon is not just a matter of individual judges or individual cases. It is now a systematic phenomenon with deep institutional roots. In political science literature there is a familiar term — democratic barbarism. Democratic barbarism is often sustained by a judicial barbarism. The term “barbarism” has several components. The first is the overwhelming appearance of arbitrariness in judicial decision-making. The application of law becomes so dependent on the arbitrary whims of individual judges that the rule of law or constitutional terms no longer have any meaning. The law becomes an instrument of oppression; or, at the very least, it aids and abets oppression. This usually means weak protection for civil liberties and dissenters and an unusual degree of deference to state power, especially in constitutional matters. The court also becomes excessively concerned with its version o...