Post RCEP walk out, Centre to focus more on bilateral trade agreements in 2020
The
Indian Express
Prabha
Raghavan
In the words of the Commerce Ministry,
Indian industry and services will be competitive and benefit from access to
“large developed markets”.
India’s
existing and stalled bilateral free trade agreements (FTAs) slowly garnered
more attention from the government this year, even as it was trying to conclude
seven year-long negotiations to join the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)- the world’s “largest” regional trade pact.
Despite the country now having backed out of the mega trade deal, its renewed
interest on its other trade pacts, several of which have failed to deliver the
results expected, has set the tone for its focus in the coming year.
In
the words of the Commerce Ministry, Indian industry and services will be
competitive and benefit from access to “large developed markets”. This includes
forging stronger economic ties with regions like the EU, with which FTA talks
were initiated in 2007 but fell through.
“The
India-EU FTA, to my mind, is an FTA we must engage in. They are countries where
India has a number of products, which we can export, which we can benefit from
… Currently, there is no discussion on the FTA. It was aborted several years
ago,” Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal said last month. Since India’s walk out from RCEP, Goyal has made more
statements at different forums about taking forward these discussions.
“I
think some progress could be made on EU in the coming year. This also depends
on how issues like the EU’s push for concessions in agriculture and India’s
demand for market access for its services sector are resolved,” said Durgesh
Rai, fellow, ICRIER. “Whether the two can close a deal in the coming year is
difficult to say. But, one thing is for certain — our willingness to move
forward with EU has definitely increased,” he said. A trade package with the US
in the spotlight earlier this year may also be a priority for the government.
In October, Goyal said the two countries had “almost resolved the broad
contours” of a trade package though nothing has fructified yet.
India
and the US have been trying to resolve trade-related issues that caused the
Trump administration to withdraw India’s benefits under its Generalized System
of Preferences (GSP) programme in June, prompting the Modi government to
respond with retaliatory tariffs. “There was a lot of expectation that they
(the government) were going to take definite steps in the US deal. That, too,
doesn’t seem to be the case, even though the US talks are the more realistic
option out of the government’s proposed negotiations at the moment,” said
Biswajit Dhar, professor at Centre for Economic Studies and Planning, Jawaharlal Nehru University.
“We
can see at least some road map or framework or way forward with the EU, but
with the US, it is more complicated. It is more political and also depends on
how far the other side is able to move on certain issues,” said ICRIER’s Rai. India
is also keen on revising its existing trade agreements with most RCEP nations,
even while it remains firm on staying out of the larger trading pact. “RCEP had
become nothing but an India-China FTA, which nobody wants,” said Goyal earlier
this month.
In
September, before India walked out of RCEP, the 10 member states of the
Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) bloc — a major chunk of the RCEP group — agreed
to review their FTA in goods with the country to simplify them for businesses.
Officials involved in this review are expected to submit an update at the 17th
consultation of ASEAN Economic Ministers to be held next year. This is also
crucial as India, currently, has a trade deficit with all RCEP countries
because its industries have not been able to take advantage of these FTAs.
It
has been pushing for similar reviews with Japan and South Korea, two other RCEP
nations, but some trade experts feel that it should also be pursuing fresh FTAs
with some of the other remaining countries in the mega trade deal.
“They
should try to get FTAs with Australia and New Zealand as well … so whatever the
potential damage we may see from India not joining RCEP can be reduced,” said
Rai. Meanwhile, some experts feel the government needs to reassure all
stakeholders that it can lift the economy out of its current state before moving
ahead with trade agreements.
“The
RCEP decision was taken two months ago, and, since then there are no signs that
the economy has improved,” said Dhar. “Hemorrhaging of the manufacturing sector
has subsided … but rating agencies show that the country is still in the middle
of a crisis,” he said. “The
government had earlier chosen the easier option of monetary policy as a
solution, but this kind of supply-side measure didn’t have any impact on the
economy. What we need now is certain fiscal measures to crack this logjam,” he
said. Dhar and Rai expect the Centre to be cautious in taking potential trade
deals forward in 2020, a sentiment that already seems to be echoed by Goyal. “I
think the lessons to be learnt are that we should never finalise a trade agreement
in a hurry, with a timeline like it was done in 2010 or 2011 with Japan, with
Korea, with Malaysia, with ASEAN countries,” Goyal said soon after the RCEP
deal fell through. “I can assure all of you that going forward, none of the
FTAs will be settled in a hurry or will be settled to the disadvantage of
Indian industry and exporters,” the Minister said in a separate forum earlier
this month.
Comments
Post a Comment