Inverted duty structure hurts soaps industry
Business Line
G. Chandrashekhar
In an inexplicable departure from what should have been obvious and
rational, the Union Finance Ministry has created an ‘inverted duty’
structure for some of the imported raw materials for the country’s
personal care industry. Palm fatty acid distillate (PFAD) and
crude palm stearin (CPS) are raw materials used in the manufacture of
toilet soaps, soap noodles, shampoo and other personal care products.
They are imported for producing oleochemicals such as fatty acids and
fatty alcohols.
Customs duty
Both PFAD and CPS were
allowed at nil rate of customs duty under the ‘actual user’ condition in
June 2017, providing a boost to the domestic personal care and
oleochemicals industry. The logic of the ‘actual user’ condition was to
ensure prevention of excessive import and leakage of revenue.
However,
on July 5, in the Union Budget 2019-20, the Finance Minister imposed a
7.5 per cent customs duty on their import, the rationale for which is
unclear. Whether it was by accident (oversight) or by design (succumbing
to lobby pressure) is not known either. While a change in customs
duty applicable on imported goods from time to time is nothing unusual
in our country, the imposition of 7.5 per cent duty on import of PFAD
and CPS is proving to be counter-productive as the duty structure
between the raw material and finished product has been inverted.
It
is pertinent that imports of finished products such as soaps and soap
noodle, as also fatty alcohols, attract zero duty when imported from
Asean countries, while the raw materials (PFAD, CPS) now attract 7.5 per
cent duty. The inverted duty structure has encouraged import of
finished products, while at the same time threatening large investments
made by the domestic personal care industry and splitting industry.
A
combination of customs duty and the depreciating rupee is seen pushing
the personal care industry’s costs higher, thus compromising the
interests of consumers of the products. At the same time, there are no
import substitutes available for the user industry.
Demand for 'status quo'
Frequent
changes in customs duty on critical raw material imports for the
manufacturing industry are best avoided. Predictability, transparency
and certainty in fiscal legislation is critical. The extant change in
duty has advanced none of these. If anything, it has challenged
predictability, created uncertainty and is sure to discourage further
investment. If tariff change becomes expedient, it is necessary to go
public with the reasons.
The industry has demanded the restoration of status quo ante
– that is to allow the import of requisite raw material such as PFAD
and CPS at nil rate under actual user condition, as in the past. The
ball is clearly in the FM’s court.
Comments
Post a Comment