Time
Magazine
Published
By: Billy Perrigo
India moved a step closer on
Tuesday to making it easier to imprison and deport some members of its
200-million strong Muslim minority, in a significant challenge to the country’s
secular constitution.
On Tuesday, Indian lawmakers
passed the Citizenship Amendment Bill through the lower house of Parliament
where the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, has a huge
majority.
The BJP came to power under
Modi in 2014, but won a landslide reelection in May with an increased majority.
Since then, the government has embarked on increasingly bold moves to reshape
India according to its ideology, sidelining Muslims in the process.
In August, bolstered by
victory, Modi revoked the constitutional autonomy of Kashmir,
India’s only Muslim-majority state. Soldiers poured in, setting up
roadblocks, imposing a curfew and imprisoning political leaders.
And in November, India’s top court settled a politically charged court battle
over a plot of holy land contested for decades
between Hindus and Muslims, ruling in the Hindus’ favor. Throughout, the Modi
government has turned a blind eye to mob violence against Muslims.
But the Citizenship Amendment
Bill is Modi’s biggest effort yet to change the religious and social makeup of
India in line with Hindu nationalist beliefs. Here’s what to know.
What is the
Citizenship Amendment Bill?
The Citizenship Amendment Bill
would give many citizens of Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh the
opportunity to apply for Indian citizenship based on their beliefs alone. But
the Bill stipulates they must be Hindu, Christian, Sikh, Jain, Parsi or
Buddhist; Muslims are not listed.
The BJP says it is trying to
protect people from persecuted communities in other South Asian countries,
making it easier for them to apply for Indian citizenship. But Rohingya Muslims
from Myanmar (who the U.N. says are victims of genocide) and members of Muslim
minority sects in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh would all be blocked
from claiming citizenship under the bill.
Opponents are also concerned
that the Citizenship Amendment Bill undermines India’s constitutionally
mandated secularism, and could make it easier for Muslims within India to be
thrown in prison and even deported if they cannot prove their Indian
citizenship. They say the bill fits into a pattern of BJP measures that
threaten to turn Muslims into second-class citizens in India.
The Citizenship Amendment Bill
follows a yearslong BJP project, initially tested in Assam,
a state in northeastern India. In 2015, the 33 million people who live in Assam were asked to provide documents
proving their Indian citizenship dating back to before the 1971 war. Many were
unable to, having lived lives of displacement and poverty. In August, 1.9 million people, thought to be mostly Muslims, were left
off the state’s final official list of citizens. The government is
now constructing 10 prison camps to house those who fail an appeal process.
Modi’s Home Minister, Amit
Shah, has long spoken of his desire to eliminate “infiltrators” in Assam from neighboring
Bangladesh, saying he wants to replicate the process in the rest of the
country.
After the bill passed the lower
house of Parliament, Shah reaffirmed his plans to roll out the National
Register of Citizens (the measure requiring all residents of Assam to prove
their citizenship) to the entire country. But, arguing against critics who have
called it part of the same project as the new Citizenship Amendment Bill, he
said the two should not be compared. “There is no need to connect [the]
Citizenship [Amendment] Bill with National Register of Citizens,” he said.
“Rest assured, [the National Register of Citizens] will be brought in soon.”
Is the bill
likely to become law?
The bill passed with little
challenge in the Lok Sabha, the lower house of the Indian parliament, thanks to
the BJP’s large majority there.
It now moves to the upper
house, where the BJP relies on coalition partners for its majority. That could
slow the bill’s passage, though most analysts say it is still likely to become
law.
Comments
Post a Comment