Jammu and Kashmir removed from list of 'disputes' under UN
NDTV
Published By: Anonymous
United Nations: In a significant
development, Jammu and Kashmir has been removed from the United Nations(UN)
list of unresolved disputes, giving a setback to Pakistan which has been asking
the world body to intervene on the issue.
The omission of Jammu and Kashmir from a list of
disputes under the observation of the UN Security Council was noticed by
Pakistan whose envoy has lodged a protest.
"Jammu and Kashmir dispute was not
mentioned in the context of unresolved long-running situations," said
Amjad Hussain B Sial, Pakistan' acting envoy to the UN.
"We understand this was an inadvertent
omission, as Jammu and Kashmir is one of the oldest disputes on agenda of the
Security Council," he added.
Sial was speaking at the UN General Assembly
session, which was discussing the functioning and reform of the Security
Council. It was organised by the UK that holds the presidency of the Security
Council this month.
Pakistan has been asking the UN to intervene to
help resolve the issue but India has always maintained that it has to be
resolved bilaterally between the two countries.
Speaking earlier at the General Assembly, the UK
envoy to the UN, Mark Lyall Grant, said that "some long-running
situations, including in the Middle East, Cyprus and Western Sahara remain
unresolved, as do issues where the Council has become engaged in recent years,
including Nepal and Guinea Bissau."
"Huge challenges remain in Sudan, Somalia
and the DRC," he added.
Pakistan repeatedly raises Kashmir as an issue
for the UN while India asserts that it is an internal matter.
While expressing concern about the unrest,
Secretary- General Ban Ki-moon said that the UN will not intervene until
requested by both parties.
"As far as this role of good offices is
concerned, the United Nations normally takes that initiative when requested by
both parties concerned," Ban said in October.
At the debate in the General Assembly, the UK
also repeated its support to see India on as a permanent member of the Security
Council.
"On the Council's structure, we continue to
support permanent membership for Brazil, Germany, India and Japan, as well as
permanent representation for Africa," said Philip Parham, deputy envoy to
UK.
"We look forward to working with many of
these countries next year when they join the Security Council," he said,
referring to the entry of India and Germany on the Council next year as
non-permanent members for a two year term.
While Japan will leave the Council in 2011,
Brazil will serve out one more year.
The UK representative also suggested "an
intermediate model" of reform, which would create new seats with a longer
mandate than the present two year term.
Then, at the end of this period, a review would
be done to see whether these seats should be turned into permanent ones.
Pakistan, which objects to India being on the
Council, argued that the new council should include a few large states, a
number of medium sized States and a majority of smaller States.
"We support the position of the
Organization of Islamic Conference demanding adequate representation of Muslim
Ummah in the Security Council," said Sial.
"India and Pakistan, they are neighboring countries, important nations in that region - peace and security would have
important implications," he added.
Comments
Post a Comment