How the Union Cabinet’s move to strengthen IBC is a game changer
Business Line
K R Srivats
The Cabinet’s decision to provide immunity to successful
bidders removes the threat of attachment of assets due to sins of previous
promoters.
New owners of bankrupt companies and such entities
themselves are finally set to be shielded from criminal liabilities arising due
to the offences committed by previous management/promoters.
This landmark reform, which is a part of a set of proposed
amendments to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 ( IBC), has gotten the
green signal from the Union Cabinet on Wednesday, paving the way for more
bidders/resolution applicants to come forth and bid for stressed assets in the
country.
In all likelihood the proposed legislative changes to the
IBC may go through in the ongoing winter session of Parliament itself.
Simply put, the Government is moving ahead to strengthen
the IBC framework by ring-fencing the corporate debtor (already in the hands of
a successful resolution applicant) from attachment/criminal proceedings against
offences committed by previous managements.
“The proposed changes; especially those relating to
ring-fencing, should help restore investor and banker confidence in the IBC
process,” said Cyril Shroff, Managing Partner, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, a law
firm.
Why is this reform important?
It would definitely widen options in terms of interested
bidders and encourage more resolution applicants to come forward to bid for
stressed assets, without the Damocles sword of attachment of assets/criminal
proceedings swinging over their heads, said Bharat Chugh, Partner, L&L
Partners and a former judge.
There have been cases in the recent past where assets have
been included in the information memorandum available to the potential buyers
and bids have been made and won on that basis, but before it comes to execution
of that plan, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) comes in and attaches the
property, upsetting the bargain. This has far reaching implications for the
bidder and the company alike. This also has a chilling effect on bidding and
greatly undermines the very spirit of IBC which is maximisation of value,
according to Chugh. This also undermines another important aim of IBC, which
is to give ailing companies — a fresh start and a clean slate.
Great boost
The proposed reform on ring-fencing is significant as it
would give the person bidding for a company enough assurance that new
management and remaining assets of the company are safe. It is only with that
legitimate expectation that someone will invest in the company and assets would
command a price commensurate with their value.
Sapan Gupta, Partner and National Head of Banking and
Finance, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co said that the approval by the
Union Cabinet to provide immunity to successful bidders under IBC process is a
great boost to the Code. This is a positive and timely step and will increase
confidence among prospective buyers of stressed assets.
Lessons learnt
Among the other changes to the IBC, the Centre has
proposed introduction of additional thresholds for financial creditors
represented by an authorised representative due to large numbers (read home
buyers) in order to prevent frivolous triggering of corporate insolvency
resolution process (CIRP).
Clearly, the Government has learnt some lessons from the
experience of a single home buyer misusing the framework and dragging a entire
real estate company to National Company Law Tribunal.
Meanwhile, the Centre has in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Code (second amendment) Bill stipulated that at least hundred allottees under
the same real estate project or 10 per cent of total number of allottees under
the same real estate project, whichever is less is required to initiate
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).
Comments
Post a Comment