Experts ask NIN to withdraw report favouring Akshay Patra
The HinduDated May 13, 2019
Nutritional norms of ‘no onion, garlic’ mid-day meals not based on
empirical evidence
Doctors,
researchers and activists on Monday addressed an open letter to scientists at
the National Institute of Nutrition (NIN) urging them to withdraw a report that
declared mid-day meals provided without onion and garlic by the Akshaya Patra
Foundation (APF) as compliant with the government’s nutritional norms on
grounds that the conclusion is not based on empirical evidence.
The Karnataka
government had sought a technical report from NIN following complaints by the
State Food Commission as well as civil society groups about the foundation’s
refusal to provide onion and garlic in the food supplied to 2,814 schools in
six districts in the State, which was in violation of norms prescribed by the
local as well as the Central government.
“The National
Institute of Nutrition, to our utter shock and dismay, has made sweeping
statements praising Akshaya Patra Foundation, without carrying out any
systematic scientific study. No empirical data was collected on the quantity
and quality of ingredients used or amount consumed and amount wasted by
children to certify food supplied by APF as nutritionally adequate,” says the
letter signed by 10 organisations and 94 individuals.
Instead, the
signatories say, the entire report had been prepared on the basis of a menu
submitted by the Foundation.
“We urge you to
withdraw the report immediately pending a systematic field evaluation of the
food being supplied by APF,” adds the letter.
The NIN was asked
to look into four major issues — nutritional compliance, food safety measures,
taste, and diversity of meals. Earlier, the Karnataka State Food Commission (KSFC),
following visits to schools, noted that the food provided by APF was bland and
monotonous, as a result of which children were consuming less than the
prescribed quantity of meals, defeating the purpose of the mid-day meal scheme.
The letter also
highlights how another institute that was asked to look into the matter,
Central Food Technological Research Institute (CFTRI), sought “four to six”
months to be able to comment on the issue.
Activists say that
following the KSFC’s findings, a specific menu was prescribed for contractors,
but APF had violated these norms. They also say that APF’s refusal to provide
onion and garlic on religious grounds is a violation of the law.
In its report on
February 14, 2019, the NIN had submitted that the nutritive value of APF’s
meals “certainly meet and often exceed the prescribed energy and protein
requirements” and cited “convincing personal accounts” by scientists who
visited APF’s kitchens as proof of high safety standards. It concluded that the
mid-day meals served by APF complied with nutrition norms laid down by the
government.
Comments
Post a Comment