Telephonic interceptions carried out in national interest: MHA to Delhi HC
The Indian Express
Pritam Pal Singh
March 26, 2019
Telephonic
interceptions carried out in national interest: MHA to Delhi HC
The submissions were
made in the backdrop of a petition alleging illegal phone tapping of National
Security Advisor Ajit Doval, then Law Secretary Suresh Chandra, and some senior
CBI officers.
The Ministry of Home
Affairs on Monday told the Delhi High Court that telephonic interceptions by
the Law Enforcement Agencies are carried out in the “interest of the
sovereignty and integrity of India”.
The submissions were
made in the backdrop of a petition alleging illegal phone tapping of National
Security Advisor Ajit Doval, then Law Secretary Suresh Chandra, and some senior
CBI officers.
The ministry further
informed the bench headed by Chief Justice Rajendra Menon that Rule “419A of
the Indian Telegraph (Amendment) Rules 2007 adequately provides for constitution
of a Review Committee by the Central government and the State government, as
the case may be, to review the directions for interceptions”.
The ministry said in
its affidavit, “The Review Committee within a period of sixty days from the
issue of directions shall suo motu make necessary enquiries and investigations
and record its findings whether the directions issued… are in accordance with the
provisions of Section 5 (2) of the Indian Telegraph Act.
“When the Review
Committee is of the opinion that the directions are not in accordance with the
provisions referred to above, it may set aside the directions and order for
destruction of the copies of the intercepted message or class of messages.”
The affidavit said that
the records pertaining to such directions for interception and of intercepted
messages shall be destroyed by the relevant competent authority and the
authorised security and Law Enforcement Agencies every six months unless these
are required for functional requirement.
It further said that
the “requirement of giving justification with each proposal for interception
has already been incorporated in the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) issued
by the Ministry of Home Affairs in May 2011 and concerned law
enforcement/security agencies have been sensitised from time to time to follow
these guidelines”.
The court is scheduled
to hear the PIL on Tuesday, which has also sought a direction to the CBI for
framing comprehensive guidelines regarding tracing, tapping and surveillance of
phone calls along with preparation of stocks and accountability of officials.
The ministry said that
the “contention with respect to exercise to the right to speech and expression
under Article 19 of the Constitution of India and protections guaranteed under
the Constitution of India is not absolute”.
“Article 19(2) of the
Constitution of India specifically provides for reasonable restrictions and all
rights can be restricted in the interest of sovereignty and integrity of India,
security of State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order,
decency, or morality or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or
incitement to an offence,” the affidavit said.
Citing the infighting
within the CBI between its former director Alok Verma and special director
Rakesh Asthana, against whom an FIR of extortion and bribery was lodged by the
agency, the PIL said that “public servants working in said organization need to
conduct themselves in a manner so that integrity of the institution is
maintained”.
The ministry, however,
stated that the Supreme Court in the matter of “Alok Kumar Verma vs Union of
India has already appreciated all evidence and procedure adopted in the said
case by the agencies”.
Comments
Post a Comment