Farm subsidies: India must keep a vigil


Business Line
James J Nedumpara / Sparsha Janardhan 
March 27, 2019

 Farm subsidies: India must keep a vigil

Waiving off farm loans is the worst thing to do: Lord Meghnad Desai

Fertiliser Ministry seeks additional Rs 23,000 crore to clear Jan-Mar subsidy bill

WTO‘s ruling on China’s farm subsidies has important lessons for India and other developing nations.

Agriculture is a widely subsidised sector in several countries. Amidst the escalating trade war between the US and China, the WTO gave a notable ruling in February 2019, in a challenge involving certain agricultural policies of China. This ruling is on one of the two disputes filed by the US against China’s farm subsidies on grains.

China – Agricultural Producers (DS511) related to China’s compliance with its domestic support commitments under the WTO Agreement of Agriculture (AoA). China not being an original WTO member, but a member that acceded much later, received a certain unique treatment. China undertook obligations not to provide domestic support in excess of the de minimis level of 8.5 per cent of the total value of agriculture production.

Although China received treatment as a developing country, it did not receive the cushion of 10 per cent de minimis limit which other developing countries received. In this dispute, the allegation was that China exceeded the de minimis for Indica rice, Japonica rice, wheat and corn for the years 2012 to 2015. The calculation of domestic subsidies in agriculture is particularly complex and is captured in the concept ‘aggregate measurement of support’ (AMS). Most governments provide agriculture subsidies in the nature of market price support. In China, the Minimum Procurement Price (MPP) programmes for wheat and rice apply in certain provinces such as Hubei, Anhui, and Jiangsu.

Under the programme, government purchases of agricultural products occur only when market prices fall below the established MPP level. Such market price support programmes should be included in the calculation of AMS.

Complex calculations

The AMS is not just the budgetary expenditure of the government to provide subsidies to the agricultural products. It depends on certain external factors as well. The calculation of quantum of market price support is based on the price gap between the ‘applied administered price’ identified in the domestic support measure and the ‘fixed external reference price’ multiplied by the quantity of eligible production.

An understanding of these concepts is crucial in evaluating the agriculture policies of other agrarian countries such as India. India too provides certain minimum support price (MSP) for agricultural products, which is akin to the applied administered price.

The determination of AMS significantly depends on the quantity of production eligible to receive the applied administered price. There is lack of clarity in the AoA as to whether “eligible quantity of production” refers to the total production of the concerned product or the amount actually procured by a WTO member.

The China dispute sheds some light on the quantity of eligible production, albeit in a limited sense. Previously, the Appellate Body ruling in Korea –Beef (2000) interpreted the eligible quantity of production to mean the amount of commodity produced that is entitled to receive the support, rather than the production actually purchased by the government.

Interestingly, China applied a number of criteria to limit the quantity of eligible production, such as: the geographical scope (MPP programmes limited to certain provinces), temporal scope (time period in which purchases were made), activation and de-activation (procurement only in cases where price drops below certain levels), minimum grain quality requirement, and consumption of grains in small-scale farms.

The WTO panel examined these factors and concluded that the quantity of production eligible to receive the market price support to be the entire volume of production in the relevant specified provinces. China successfully convinced the panel on the geographical scope and the grain quality requirement but failed to do so with the rest of the criteria. Pursuant to AMS calculations, the panel concluded that China had breached its de minimis level and acted inconsistently with the AoA.

The decision’s import
This decision has significance for a number of developing countries, including India. Most developing countries do not set targets for procurement of foodgrains in their market price support programmes. A possible consequence could be that some of the agriculture support programmes could come under WTO dispute scrutiny.

The Ministerial Decision in Bali on Public Stockholding for Food Security Purposes gives reasonable comfort to developing countries to provide agricultural support for food security purposes. However, countries will have to fulfil certain conditions such as notification and transparency requirements. Developing countries that take recourse to the Bali decision will find some parts of the China farm dispute particularly useful and instructive.

Link https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/farm-subsidies-india-must-keep-a-vigil/article26655589.ece


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

India Joins Russia in Voting Against West-Backed Move to Expand Powers of OPCW

The Wire: June 28, 2018 New Delhi: India voted against a UK-backed move that will allow the global chemical weapons watchdog to apportion blame for illegal attacks, criticising the decision to grant “unchecked powers” to the head of the group which could be used for “partisan” purposes. On Wednesday, more than two-thirds of the member states of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) voted to authorise the international body to identify the perpetrators and sponsors of a chemical weapons attack. It also specifically called on the OPCW’s technical secretariat to begin work on identifying the perpetrators behind the use of chemical weapons in Syria. The draft decision, sponsored by 30 countries, was adopted at the fourth special session of the conference of the states parties to the Chemical Weapons Convention at the Hague, with 82 in favour and 24 negative votes. While Europe, the United States and their allies voted ‘yes’, there was strong oppo...
Read more

As financial insecurity rises in urban India, so does investment in insurance

Image
Scroll.in March 13, 2020 Urban Indians are becoming less confident about their financial security. Up to 58% of them fret over financial independence post retirement, which is a 4% increase from last year. An equal share of urban Indians worry about meeting their daily medical expenses and sustaining their current lifestyle once they stop working. The findings are part of a survey published by Delhi-based Max Life Insurance in association with London-based consultancy Kantar. The firms surveyed 7,014 respondents in 25 cities, including six metros, nine tier-1 cities, and 10 tier-2 cities, between December 2019 and January 2020. Source: Max Life Insurance via Quartz The trends Source: Max Life Insurance via Quartz Source: Max Life Insurance via Quartz Source: Max Life Insurance via Quartz A significant share of urban Indians also say their families will have no financial support in the event of the breadwinner’s death. In such a scenario, around 57% believe the family sav...
Read more

ED tracks Swiss Bank A/Cs of Agusta scamster

The Poineer February 10,2019 Rakesh K Singh The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has tracked a dozen Swiss bank accounts in the name of Rajiv Saxena, who is key accused in the Rs 3,600 crore AgustaWestland VVIP chopper scam. The ED has also found out accounts held by  his family members and associates where the kickbacks in the now scrapped deal were allegedly parked. Two bank accounts are in the name of Rajiv Saxena’s  associates Pankaj Jain and Sumita Jain who are also the authorised signatories. The  third is in the name of another associate Ajit Singh Bubber, but Rajiv and his family members are authorised signatories. The remaining nine accounts are largely owned and operated by Rajiv, his family members and associates. Rajiv Saxena was deported by the UAE authorities on January 30 and the ED formally arrested him the next day and a court later granted his remand to the agency. He is currently undergoing custodial interrogation by the ED. The agency had in 2017...
Read more