EC red-flags new poll funding norms to SC: ‘serious impact’
The Indian Express
Ananthakrishnan G
March 28, 2019
EC red-flags new poll
funding norms to SC: ‘serious impact’
The EC also said that
the changes in the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 (FCRA) “would
allow unchecked foreign funding of political parties in India, which could lead
to Indian policies being influenced by foreign companies”.
Lok Sabha Elections
2019: Over 68,000 registered, but official says there are many more
The Centre had
earlier told the court that the decision to introduce electoral bonds was “a
big step towards electoral reform” and the process to acquire/ encash them
would “ensure transparency” and “accountability”. (Illustration by Manali
Ghosh)
Red-flagging the
electoral bond scheme, the Election Commission (EC) has told the Supreme Court
that it had
conveyed to the
Centre, in 2017, that the changes made in several laws related to political
funding would have “serious repercussions/ impact on the transparency aspect…
of funding of political parties”.
In an affidavit filed
on March 25, the EC said it had communicated its concerns regarding “certain
provisions of the Finance Act, 2017, and the corresponding amendments carried
out in the Income Tax Act, the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and the Companies
Act, 2013…” to the Union Law Ministry in a letter dated May 26, 2017.
The EC also said that
the changes in the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 (FCRA) “would
allow unchecked foreign funding of political parties in India, which could lead
to Indian policies being influenced by foreign companies”.
The affidavit was
filed by Vijay Kumar Pande, Director (Law), Election Commission of India, in
response to petitions filed by the CPI(M) and the Association for Democratic
Reforms, challenging the constitutional validity of the electoral bond scheme.
Follow more election news here.
The Centre had
earlier told the court that the decision to introduce electoral bonds was “a
big step towards electoral reform” and the process to acquire/ encash them
would “ensure transparency” and “accountability”.
The EC, however, said
the move would take donations received by a political party out of the ambit of
reporting them as per provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
It said it had conveyed in its letter that “in a situation where contributions
received through electoral bonds are not reported, on perusal of the
contribution reports of the political parties, it cannot be ascertained whether
the political party has taken any donation in violation of provisions under
Section 29B of the Representation of the People Act 1971, which prohibits
political parties from taking donations from government companies and foreign
sources”.
On the changes in the
FCRA, through the Finance Act, 2016, the EC said it “allows donations to be
received from foreign companies having majority stake in Indian companies,
provided that they follow the FEMA guidelines pertaining to foreign investment
in the sector in which they operate… This is a change from the existing law
barring donations from all foreign sources as defined under the Foreign
Contribution (Regulation) Act.”
The EC also said that
in March 2017, it “had written to the Ministry of Law and Justice that many
political parties had been reporting a major part of the donations received as
being less than the prescribed limit of Rs 20,000, for which details regarding name,
address and PAN of the donors were not being maintained.”
Accordingly, it
recommended some changes in law to ensure transparency in political funding and
to reduce the limit of anonymous cash donations to Rs 2,000.
The EC said it had,
in 2004 and 2016, sent proposals to the government to bring about changes in
laws to ensure transparency in the collection and spending of funds by
political parties.
Comments
Post a Comment