What’s next in GST: Consistent laws, crackdown on evaders
Economics times
February
12, 2019
Pratik
Jain
We
started with complex multirate structure, with five tax slabs — 1%, 5%, 12%,
18%, and 28%. In November 2017, GST rate was slashed from 28% to 18% on over
170 items, followed by pruning of the list further in July 2018
and then in January of this year. While there are still few items (like
cement), besides those contemplated initially, it’s only a matter of
time that rate on these items will also come down to 18%. Structurally, this
should also pave the way for simplification of the rate structure, possibly
from five slabs to possibly three over next couple of years, with likely convergence
of 12% and 18% rate to a standard rate of 15% to 16%.
Aviation
Turbine Fuel (ATF) and Natural Gas may also come within the GST ambit and so can
real estate, on which consensus seems to be emerging now.
Relief
for home buyers
Real
estate may be the only major sector where effective rate of tax has arguably
gone up in GST. To address this issue, the government is apparently contemplating
to reduce the GST rate to 5% (without input credit) or around 8% (with input
credit) for property under construction. While reduction of rate without
restricting input credit would certainly be better
from policy standpoint, in either case, home buyers are likely to be benefited.
New
compliance framework
The
government has proposed to introduce new return filing system by April 2019.
Under the new system, input tax credit available to businesses would only be
limited to the extent it is reflected on the GST portal.
Fur
ther, only one monthly return would be required, as against three monthly
returns envisaged earlier. It is expected that the new return filing system
shall be more efficient and businesses would be provided adequate time to
undertake necessary IT related customisations without any disruption in their
business operations.

Focus
on dispute resolution
In its
first 18 months, GST has witnessed fair bit of litigations already. Companies
have
approached
courts on variety of issues, including transitional issues, input credits and advance
rulings issued by various states. There have been instances where different
states have taken varying positions on same
issue
in advance ruling issued.
In the recent GST council meeting, a decision
was taken to create a centralised body to address a scenario where such a
situation arises. This
process
is likely to continue. However, it is important for the GST council to ensure
that laws should be consistent across the states and exceptions such as
allowing a state to impose a cess or to have a different threshold from others
are avoided.
Tightening
of tax administration
The GST
collections have not been as buoyant as government expected. Substantial rate cuts
and relief to small taxpayers mean that there would be pressure on exchequer.
This would mean that larger businesses may be scrutinised with more rigour and
the wealth of data, which is available to the government, may be used to check
tax evasion.
Comments
Post a Comment