How first time UN talked of attack in J&K: Delhi worked phones in DC and Beijing

Monday, February 25, 2019
THE United Nations Security Council’s condemnation statement Thursday on the Pulwama terrorist attack is the very first time that a terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir has been condemned by the UNSC.
For, the fact is that the UN considers Jammu and Kashmir “disputed territory”, and has not been able to come to a consensus on the definition of “terrorism.” As a result, the UNSC has never been involved in past terrorist attacks in Kashmir.
That’s why the statement was a major breakthrough and it came after frenetic diplomacy, with more than a little help from Washington, sources have told The Indian Express. “In the UN community, one man’s terrorist is another’s freedom fighter. That debate has been at the heart of not being able to adopt the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism (CCIT). That conventional divide was the key issue to be breached,” said a source who negotiated the text of the statement that condemned the attack and named Jaish-e-Mohammed.
When New Delhi decided to launch the diplomatic offensive to isolate Pakistan on the morning of February 15, Foreign Secretary Vijay Gokhale and Secretaries of the MEA started meeting envoys of major countries — the G-20, South Asian neighbours, ASEAN countries and Europeans among others. Phones were also being worked by Indian envoys in major world capitals, including at the UN in New York.
“After the Parliament attack or the 26/11 terror attack, we got a condemnation within a couple of days. But this was much more difficult than we had imagined,” a top source told The Indian Express who has worked in drafting previous statements. What New Delhi was able to impress upon the majority of the UNSC was to “locate” the Pulwama terrorist attack in the global war against terrorism.
Indian diplomats used the FBI’s definition of terrorism to convince UNSC members: “the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a Government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.”
Washington took the lead; France, UK and Russia were on board, while China was the only holdout. None of the non-permanent members had any objections. “Much of the heavy-lifting was done by the US,” a source said and much of the conversations took place in Washington and Beijing with Delhi coordinating between them and others.
As Pakistan got wind of this, its UN envoy Maleeha Lodhi met UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres and Pakistan Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi wrote a letter to Guterres requesting him to play a role to “de-escalate” tension in the region. The Chinese mission in Washington DC and New York kept referring the issue back to Beijing’s court.
Sources said China asked UNSC members to use Guterres’s language which was part of his spokesperson’s statement on Day One: “We strongly condemn today’s attack in Jammu and Kashmir Pulwama district…”
Delhi wanted stronger language so that the UNSC could take a cue. So, on February 19, Guterres’s spokesperson said: “We’re deeply concerned at the increase in tensions between the two countries in the wake of the attack on Indian security personnel on 14 February in Pulwama.”
So, for the first time the language had changed from “attack in Jammu and Kashmir” to “attack on Indian security personnel”. “That made the difference”, the source said.
Finally, with intense lobbying by Trump administration officials and French diplomats, Beijing yielded. “China agreed to name Jaish-e-Mohammed in the statement as they wanted to cut their losses. Sometimes you take a decision to gain something, sometimes you don’t want to waste political capital on something like this,” a source said.
China signed off on the UNSC statement that “condemned in the strongest terms” the Pulwama terror attack and named Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammad for the “heinous and cowardly suicide bombing”.
Sources cautioned this doesn’t mean that the UNSC debate on Kashmir has been settled. “But we have been able to push the envelope this time,” the source said.
The UNSC statement naming JeM is also significant because China has singlehandedly blocked the listing of JeM chief Masood Azhar as a “global terrorist” at the UN Security Council Resolution 1267 sanctions committee for the last 10 years. At least three attempts in the last decade, in 2009, 2016 and 2017, have been blocked by Beijing at Pakistan’s behest.
The statement “urged all States, in accordance with their obligations under international law and relevant Security Council resolutions, to cooperate actively with the Government of India and all other relevant authorities in this regard”. This is a reference to the Indian government’s efforts to list Azhar as a global terrorist.
https://indianexpress.com/article/india/how-first-time-un-talked-of-attack-in-jk-delhi-worked-phones-in-dc-and-beijing-5597422/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

India Joins Russia in Voting Against West-Backed Move to Expand Powers of OPCW

The Wire: June 28, 2018 New Delhi: India voted against a UK-backed move that will allow the global chemical weapons watchdog to apportion blame for illegal attacks, criticising the decision to grant “unchecked powers” to the head of the group which could be used for “partisan” purposes. On Wednesday, more than two-thirds of the member states of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) voted to authorise the international body to identify the perpetrators and sponsors of a chemical weapons attack. It also specifically called on the OPCW’s technical secretariat to begin work on identifying the perpetrators behind the use of chemical weapons in Syria. The draft decision, sponsored by 30 countries, was adopted at the fourth special session of the conference of the states parties to the Chemical Weapons Convention at the Hague, with 82 in favour and 24 negative votes. While Europe, the United States and their allies voted ‘yes’, there was strong oppo...
Read more

As financial insecurity rises in urban India, so does investment in insurance

Image
Scroll.in March 13, 2020 Urban Indians are becoming less confident about their financial security. Up to 58% of them fret over financial independence post retirement, which is a 4% increase from last year. An equal share of urban Indians worry about meeting their daily medical expenses and sustaining their current lifestyle once they stop working. The findings are part of a survey published by Delhi-based Max Life Insurance in association with London-based consultancy Kantar. The firms surveyed 7,014 respondents in 25 cities, including six metros, nine tier-1 cities, and 10 tier-2 cities, between December 2019 and January 2020. Source: Max Life Insurance via Quartz The trends Source: Max Life Insurance via Quartz Source: Max Life Insurance via Quartz Source: Max Life Insurance via Quartz A significant share of urban Indians also say their families will have no financial support in the event of the breadwinner’s death. In such a scenario, around 57% believe the family sav...
Read more

ED tracks Swiss Bank A/Cs of Agusta scamster

The Poineer February 10,2019 Rakesh K Singh The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has tracked a dozen Swiss bank accounts in the name of Rajiv Saxena, who is key accused in the Rs 3,600 crore AgustaWestland VVIP chopper scam. The ED has also found out accounts held by  his family members and associates where the kickbacks in the now scrapped deal were allegedly parked. Two bank accounts are in the name of Rajiv Saxena’s  associates Pankaj Jain and Sumita Jain who are also the authorised signatories. The  third is in the name of another associate Ajit Singh Bubber, but Rajiv and his family members are authorised signatories. The remaining nine accounts are largely owned and operated by Rajiv, his family members and associates. Rajiv Saxena was deported by the UAE authorities on January 30 and the ED formally arrested him the next day and a court later granted his remand to the agency. He is currently undergoing custodial interrogation by the ED. The agency had in 2017...
Read more