Clock ticking on FATF action plan implementation
The Express TribuneDecember 06, 2018Shahbaz Rana
ISLAMABAD: A meeting
of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is just weeks away but Pakistan is
still grappling to cope with a critical deficiency in its legal regime that
could leave a question mark over the country’s demonstrable capacity to seize
properties of terrorist organisations.
The problem has
arisen because of conflicting positions that Pakistan took before the FATF in
earlier meetings about its legal regimes with regard to the freezing real
estate assets of proscribed organisations, said sources in the Ministry of
Finance.
The conflicting
position suggests incompetence of the team that negotiated with the FATF. The
government is trying to address the issue before the upcoming ‘face-to-face’
meeting of the International Cooperation Review Group (ICRG) of the FATF,
scheduled for the first week of January.
Finance Minister
Asad Umar has held numerous meetings on the implementation status of the
27-point action plan of the FATF, said the sources. Out of these 27 actions,
Pakistan is required to deliver on 10 points by January 2019.
The sources said
at least two action points are directly related to the issue of seizure of real
estate assets of proscribed organisations. But the authorities are
hopeful that all the 10 action plans will be completed well before the time.
One of the
outstanding issues is the right legal regime to freeze immovable assets of
terror outfits. One view was that Pakistan can fulfill this obligation under
the UN Security Council Act of 1948. But the other view was that the government
may have to amend this law to cover some of the deficiencies.
In order to
address the legal lacuna, the government may have to promulgate an ordinance as
it lacks majority in the upper house of the parliament
With effect from
June this year, the FATF has placed Pakistan on the grey list of the countries
that have deficiencies in their legal regime meant to combat money laundering
and terror financing.
The country will
have to deliver on all the 27 points by September next year. In case it fails,
Pakistan can be blacklisted, which carries serious financial implications.
Pakistan will
have to technically comply to “demonstrate a comprehensive legal obligation to
implement recommendation on targeted financial sanctions without delay, both
asset freezing and ongoing prohibitions to provide funds and financial
services,” says the Immediate Outcome of 10 (a).
This must include
powers to take control of the funds or other assets and prevent the raising and
moving of funds by the UN-designated persons.
The Immediate
Outcome 10 (f) states that by January 2019, Pakistan will also have to
demonstrate effective implementation of targeted financial sanctions against
the assets of UNSC Resolution number 1267 and 1373 designated persons and
entities and their affiliates.
These include
Da’ish, Al Qaida, Falahi Insaniyat Foundation (FIF), Jamaat-ud-Dawa,
Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohmmad, Haqqani Network and persons affiliated with
the Taliban.
The last Pakistan
Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) government had promulgated the Anti-Terrorism
(Amendment) Ordinance, 2018 to address the legal deficiency.
However, the
sources said that there was no need for the Ordinance at that time as the UNSC
Act of 1948 and its Statutory Regulatory Orders (SROs) provided sufficient
legal basis to implement UNSCR Resolution 1267. After promulgation of the
Ordinance, which has already lapsed, Pakistani authorities claimed before the
ICRG that the ordinance provided base for freezing real estate assets.
The sources said
subsequent to the ICRG Joint Group face-to-face meeting in May 2018, Pakistan
reported that under the UNSC Act 1948, it was still possible to freeze all
assets including moveable and immoveable.
Pakistan then
took a position that that the purpose of the amendment in the Anti-Terrorism
Act was to facilitate enforcement actions by law enforcement agencies against
the persons and entities that were violating the sanctions, especially
registering and prosecuting cases in the courts.
The UNSC Act of
1948 states that the federal government to apply any measures, not involving
the use of armed force, to give effect to any decision of the UNSC and may by
order published in the official Gazette, make such provisions (including
provisions having extra-territorial operation) as appear to it necessary or expedient
for enabling those measures to be effectively applied, and without prejudice to
the generality of the foregoing power, provision may be made for the punishment
of persons offending against the order.
The sources said
these were comprehensive legal powers and the Pakistani authorities should not
have changed their position on the issue. They said Pakistan was
well-positioned to present its case in the next FATF meeting and there would
not be any major issue.
They said due to
measures taken during past nine months, Pakistani law enforcement agencies and
other regulatory bodies are in a better position to assess the terrorism
financing risks.
Comments
Post a Comment